Aesthetic Impact | Remote Viewing: One White Crow

Lyn explains in class that remote viewing assists the tasker in finding the information they need to do their job. Simply stated, whenever someone needs information to get the job done, remote viewing is another tool in the tool belt.

Basic CRV Instructor Lori Williams, featured in this Amarillo, Texas newspaper article, gives the reader an excellent glimpse into the science of controlled remote viewing. It also shows her demonstrating simple ideograms used by the subconscious / conscious minds to communicate the basic gestalts that could be found at a site during a remote viewing session: land, air, water, biological, space, natural, and manmade (Primeau).
In every CRV training session, the viewer works to build a relationship of trust between his or her two minds. The sessions are done “blind,” meaning the viewer is given coordinates and proceeds to obtain sensory perceptions while staying in structure. When the session ends, the viewer compares the sensory perceptions and sketches he or she obtained to the target feedback provided. The subconscious mind needs that feedback as the two minds develop a trusting relationship – that the information coming in will be respected.

While in training mode, the viewer establishes a “track record” of successes because the realization is always there that if the viewer completes training and moves into “operational” mode they may never get any feedback. As the viewer moves through this detailed training process, the information cued from the subconscious mind moves from general, to more detailed information, including advanced tools for measuring timelines, distance, and size. The structure and reporting processes become very precise.

Working with experts and sharing information with other students as we analyze session results has been an invaluable learning tool. We post our questions in a learning environment or in an online group gathering because none of us will view a target precisely the same way. When one of us asks a question, we all learn something. Sharing means we learn and progress as viewers.

Here are some examples of the things we learn and discuss:

	•	Staying “steady” in time and space. Five hundred years or five minutes, until it is trained, the subconscious mind will move to wherever or whatever the viewer finds the most exciting or interesting at or around the site. Yes, it really can (and will) do that!
	•	The “tasker” needs information about a building, and that building sits next to an amusement park. Until trained, a viewer’s subconscious may say “Boring!!!” and gather perceptions matching the amusement park instead of the building. As a result, the tasker could be given information that wasn’t wanted or needed. The answer? Practice, practice, practice...
	•	Until trained, the subconscious will try to “name and guess” what is happening at a site instead of doing what it should be doing: “describe, don’t identify.” That’s called “building a castle.” Not good. You’re supposed to: “get a perception and write it down and get a perception and write it down and get a perception and write it down...” Always keep the pen moving on the paper. You get the idea.
	•	Growing up and moving through life, each of us has been exposed to different circumstances and as such, each human is a unique observer of an event. None of us see or remember things exactly the same way. The analyst / viewer relationship is a serious consideration when in Operations. A good analyst will know their viewer.
	•	The less information given to the viewer the better. More information means more pollution and the tendency to build castles. Pollution increases the amount of information the subconscious has to set aside and not worry about the imagination taking over during a session. Believe it or not, it works. Better to say: “The target is an event. Describe the event.” Instead of: “Hey, this guy took off with my gold Suburban and he was wearing a red shirt and looked like he was about thirty-five!” If you had given your subconscious a simple job (describe the event) it would have gone right to it. Now it has to set aside all that pollution and filter through every gold Suburban on the planet to find yours, plus throw out all the guys not wearing red shirts... No joke, it’s like cuing a mental database to sort, file and filter.

At P>S>I, Lyn databases his viewer’s results for several reasons. In training mode it is used to identify viewer strengths and weaknesses. In Operations, it is a resource for building teams of viewers most likely to obtain optimal, accurate results. Some viewers are strong in colors, some dimensionally, some in structures, etc.

Coleen Marenich fills the complex roles of Project Management and Analysis in Operations at P>S>I. Coleen works with the tasker to determine the information needed, assembling teams of Operational Viewers, analyzing the results and writing final customer reports. She is also the Director of the P>S>I Operational Certification Program (OCP), coordinating graduates as they progress through a rigorous mentorship process and training them to the highest level of their skills and abilities. Upon completion of the OCP these operational viewers will qualify for application into the membership of the Professional CRV Association.

Lastly, I would like to congratulate Coleen on her new company, The Gadorian Group, Inc.Best of luck to her as she enters the civilian world with her new business venture. With all of the potential opportunities that CRV has to offer, all she needs is for someone to ask the question.

I hope you have enjoyed this glimpse into the world of remote viewing and nonlocality. I hope even more that you will leave here to do some exploring of your own.

Revised: tlf 3.28.09